Fruit and stroke.

11 articles, providing information about 10 different cohorts were found.

Stroke risk: Data about stroke risk was provided by 7 cohorts, including a total of 2,085 cases.
Significant protective effects were found in 3 cohorts (10, 25), and against 1 type of stroke in a fourth cohort (13), including a total of 931 cases. No other associations were found.

Note: In 2006, He FJ. published a meta-analysis of 6 cohort studies relating fruit to stroke risk. This analysis excluded data from "The Shibata Study" (Tokoyama T. 2000), and "The Framingham Study" (Gillman MW. 1995), but it included data from 1 other cohort which was not added to the following table.
The excluded article used data from "The Hiroshima Nagasaki Life Span Study" (Sauvaget C. 2003). This study provided information about stroke mortality instead of stroke risk. Therefore, information about this variable was added to the table about fruit in relation to stroke mortality.
It should be noted that, from this excluded cohort a) the strenght of the association, and b) the amount of cases, accounted to a large extend for the protective effect found in the meta-analysis by He FJ.

Stroke mortality: Data about stroke mortality was provided by 3 cohorts, including a total of 2,140 cases.
A significant protective effect was found in 1 cohort including 1,701 cases (27), but no associations were found in the other 2 cohorts (12, 31).

Conclusion: Significant protective effects against stroke risk were found in 4 cohorts of moderate-large size including 45% of all cases. No other associations were found. Suggestive evidence was found for a protective effect of total fruit against stroke risk. No level of consumption could be defined for this effect.
A significant protective effect against stroke mortality was found in 1 cohort including 79% of all cases. No evidence was found for an association between total fruit and stroke death. When stroke risk and mortality are considered one end point, fruit possibly protects against stroke.