Vegetables and esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer risk: Data about the relation with total vegetables was provided by 5 cohorts, including a total of 2,865 cases. Two articles about The EPIC Study were found, and since the articles published data about different histologic types of cancer, they were both included.
A nonsignificant protective effect was found in one cohort (Yamaji T [8]). No (non)significant associations were found in any other cohort. The average RR = 1.00 (excluding incomplete data from Boeing H [5]).

Inclusion of intermediate levels of consumption:
Data about results published in grams, servings, or cups was restricted to findings from 2 cohorts. A significantly increased risk among women was found at the level of consumption of 320-440 g/day in one cohort (George SM [7]). No other (non)significant effects were found in any cohort at any level of consumption.



RRs for the association between total vegetables and esophageal cancer risk among men & women (g/day):



Esophageal cancer mortality: No data was found.

Conclusion: A nonsignificant protective effect was found in one cohort, but no other (non)significant associations were found with esophageal cancer risk. No data was found about cancer mortality. No evidence was found for an association between total vegetables and esophageal cancer risk or mortality.

Prospective studies of total vegetables and esophageal cancer risk:
AuthorCohort nameCasesRelative Risk (RR)
9) Fan Y (2008)The Shanghai Cohort Study101HR = 0.71 (0.26-1.95; P = 0.34)
8) Yamaji T (2008)The JPHC Study116HR = 0.68 (0.42-1.10; P = 0.10)
7) George SM (2008)The NIH-AARP Diet and Health StudyMen: 463.

Women: 78.
Men: RR = 1.04 (0.78-1.39; P = 0.85).

Women: RR = 1.21 (0.54-2.71; P = 0.576)
5) González CA (2006)The EPIC Study65HR = 0.71 (0.34-1.48; P = 0.36)
5) Boeing H (2006)The EPIC Study84The RR was below 1 (no data shown).
2) Tran GD (2005)The Linxian General Population Trial1,958RR = 1.02 (0.88-1.19; P = 0.696)
Total number of cases: 2,865Average RR = 1.00