Vegetables and rectal cancer.

Total vegetables and rectal cancer risk.

Data about the relation between total vegetables and rectal cancer risk was provided by 9 cohort studies, including 2,524 + X cases (no data about the amount of cases was provided by one cohort (Park Y [27]).
A nonsignificantly increased risk among women (trend), but not men was found in one cohort (Voorrips LE [9]). No other associations were found. The average RR = 1.01 (excluding incomplete data from Park Y [27]).

Inclusion of intermediate levels of consumption:
Though in one cohort, the trend increased nonsignificantly, no (non)significant effects were found at any level of consumption among both men and women:

RRs for the association between total vegetables and rectal cancer risk among men (g/day):

RRs for the association between total vegetables and rectal cancer risk among women (g/day):


Effect modification:

  • No effect modification was found by alcohol consumption (15, 18, 25), meat consumption (18, 25), physical activity (25), and vitamin supplement use (25).
  • One (18), but not the other (25) cohort showed an increased risk among current smokers only.
  • Most (15, 25), but not all (18) cohorts showed no effect modification by BMI.

Conclusion: Few associations were found. No evidence was found for an association between total vegetables and rectal cancer risk. No evidence was found for effect modification.

Prospective studies of total vegetables and rectal cancer risk:
AuthorCohort nameCasesRelative Risk (RR)
30) Nomura AM (2008)The Multiethnic Cohort Study276 men, and

179 women
Men: RR = 0.97 (0.64-1.46; P = 0.586).
Women: RR = 1.09 (0.67-1.77; P = 0.415).
27) Park Y (2007)The NIH-AARP Diet and Health StudyNot definedMen: RR = 0.81 (0.62-1.05; P = 0.21).
Women: RR = 1.21 (0.80-1.83; P = 0.59).
25) Tsubono Y (2005)The JPHC Study154 men, and

95 women
Men: RR = 1.06 (0.63-1.78; P = 0.81).
Women: RR = 0.71 (0.36-1.38; P = 0.27).
24) Sato Y (2005)The Miyagi Cohort Study112
(not defined, stratified by gender)
Men: RR = 1.32 (0.67-2.60; P = 0.23).
Women: RR = 0.99 (0.42-2.32; P = 0.73).
18) van Duijnhoven FJ (2009)The EPIC Study991HR = 1.04 (0.81-1.33; P = 0.80).
15) Terry P (2001)The Swedish Mammography Screening Cohort159RR = 0.71 (0.45-1.12; P = 0.29).
9) Voorrips LE (2000)The Netherlands Cohort Study199 men, and

115 women
Men: RR = 0.88 (0.55-1.41; P = 0.58).
Women: RR = 1.78 (0.94-3.38; P = 0.09).
6) Michels KB (2000)The Health Professionals' Follow up Study

&

The Nurses' Health Study
89 men, and

155 women
Men: RR = 1.24.
Women: RR = 0.67.
Total number of cases: 2,524 + XAverage RR = 1.01